Compost Challenge: What’s wrong with this article?

Talk about going out on a limb. On Tuesday, I rashly announced that prizes would be presented to those who could suggest things missing from my extremely long article on compost. I haven't even put up the official rules yet, and already I've been presented with a composting question I didn't cover. (Thanks, Heather.) The question, a quite reasonable one about manure, can be viewed, by those of you who are eager to witness my come-uppance, in the comment section of Tuesday’s post.

But of course, you don't have to merely witness my humiliation; you can participate! You can contribute! And all under the guise of helping me improve the article!

(You know that expression "Rue the day?" I suspect that my own passing acquaintance with it will shortly deepen to intimacy.)

The owner of PN, Eric Vinge, who commissioned this article and who put it up on his Composter Connection site in record time, has agreed to sponsor the contest referred to a couple of days ago. So here's what you do: Think of something that should have been included in  “Compost: in the Bin, in the Garden, and in the Environment” but isn’t, or locate what seems to you the most trivial fact in the wole article, or devise an argument for including a highly un-compost-like item, and win a $25 gift-certificate at Planet Natural.

To those of you who have been breathlessly awaiting the official contest rules, I can now say, Breathe!

Tuesday's post mentioned only one category (“What’s Missing”), but three days on bread and water while being allowed to listen only to Herman’s Hermits convinced the judges to add several others. Here, then, are the official rules, as agreed upon by the board of international judges:

What’s Missing?

Point out a compost issue not covered by this article, or ask a question about composting that’s not answered or at least addressed anywhere in the Composter Connection site, and win a $25 gift certificate from Planet Natural.

(The “or at least addressed” is meant to cover stuff that’s unanswerable or information for which I refer people to other sources or sites.)

Oh—just to take all the fun out of it—Compost Tea doesn’t count. We’re doing a separate article on that. Sorry.

Entries in this category can range from standard-issue to glaring.

–standard-issue omission: The “duh,” category. This is the one that will make me smack my forehead and cry, “I can’t believe I left that out!” while everyone around says, “Well, duh.”

–most glaring omission: This one—oh, when I realize I left this one out, my numbed lips will shape no words save these: “The horror—the horror,” as everyone else at the cocktail party moves away from me, muttering to each other, “She wrote an article on composting and didn’t mention that?” —the mutters growing gradually to a dull roar until the crowd as one moves to toss their drinks in my direction, but just as they draw back their arms,

  “Wait!” a voice cries, and,

  “Saved!” I think; “a voice of kindness and reason at last—”

  “—why waste good liquor?”

  And to cries of “Right!” and “Right on!” they all turn their backs on me and drain their glasses, giving rise to the “anti-toast” and simultaneously proving once again that there actually is something worse than having an entire roomful of people toss their drinks in your face.

For the creatively inclined, we offer the following whimsical category:

The Kitchen Sink

–most tangential omission: What is the least relevant item that I “should” have included? Can you somehow make a case that the Empire State Building should have been in the article? Or pencil erasers? Why? Where?

This category presents contestants with the task of establishing a connection, however tenuous, between compost and—something.  Let us know where you think this item belongs.

ON THE OTHER HAND, some might think that the last thing this site needs is more—well, of anything. For those, we offer the following category:

Enough already!

Name what you consider to be either the least likely or the most trivial fact, story, graph, or photograph in the whole site.

–most trivial: Name what you consider the most trivial fact in the article, the one that made you clutch your hair and cry, “Why this? With wars raging, seas rising, the Dow in the negative numbers and Small Beetle still missing, she bothers with this?”

–least likely: This is the Kitchen Sink turned on its head—the item in the article that out of context, you’d be never think came out of an article on compost.

I’m hoping to get enough of these so that readers can vote for the winner.

Finally, there’s this:

Up for Grabs

This lets the judges grant an award to an entry that may not fit into any of the above categories but that clearly deserves recognition, if only because its author has taken the judges hostage and is once again threatening them with a diet of nothing but Barry Manilow.

JUST TO CLARIFY:

•    The contest refers to the composting article only, not to the items for sale. The article appears in the left side-bar in green type.

•    Multiple entries are encouraged. (The more the better.)

•    A prize will be awarded in each category.

•    We’re not sure what we’ll do for international winners, but we’ll work something out. (Some items can’t be shipped overseas, at least legally, and Eric prefers to remain on the right side of the law at present. His daughter is only seven.)

•    Entries will be accepted through May 17th. That's this year, 2009.

Post entries in the pages on the right sidebar; they're labeled by category, which should make things easier.

Have at it, people.

7 Responses to Compost Challenge: What’s wrong with this article?

  1. Oh what bloggity blog fun! :)
    Be happy that your enforced listening to Herman’s Hermits didn’t include JAS’ and mine forthcoming comparison of schoolday smutty lyrics for ‘Sunshine Girl’!

  2. Hi Kate- where do i actually post my question as entry into the contest? I don’t see a place to do it on the Compost Connection website.
    Thanks- Heather

  3. Good to see you here,VP! Hope you’re back to post multiple entries soon. I’m feeling a bit like someone who’s throwing a party and is afraid no one will come–though I think Heather will save me from that fate!
    WHAT are you up to with smutty lyrics etc.?
    Well, Heather, I was hoping to get out of that one by just having people leave comments on this post, but under the spur of your question I have set up four lovely pages in the right sidebar for your posting pleasure. Please, enjoy.
    –Kate

  4. You bet I’m entering. In fact I think some of the categories were set up specifically for JAS or me to enter :) As for smutty lyrics -JAS and I have found out we both used to sing them when we were kids (on quite separate occasions and in completely different parts of the country) and will be comparing notes on whether they’re the same ones soon.

  5. Phew, VP. As for being designed with, er, specific people in mind–I deny it categorically. However, it is true that when I suggested this to Eric, he said, something about how that altercation with the fellow in Britain last year had been good fun; it would be nice to get something like that going again.
    Looks like I’ll have to dust off my spurs, my hat, and my rifle.
    –Kate

  6. Dammit. I am so out of touch it is ridiculous. I am terribly behind in blog reading and need to pull my cotton picking socks up…….

  7. Ha.
    There is nothing in your article about the composting of live animals.
    On the subject of the fibre/leaf ratio of squirrels you remain completely mute.
    When searching for erudite discussion on the nutritional value of groundhogs I find you sadly lacking.
    The use of larger animals (such as elk, moose and bison) in compost is completely ignored.
    I claim my prize.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>